Overview / Studies

The studies

20 reports behind the findings. The lenses cut across subjects; the tracks cut across boards. Every claim in them carries a book, an edition and a page.

Core documents

Synthesis — scored social-angle comparison of five Pakistani curricula

The headline comparison: how the five boards score across seven axes, and why two defensible composite indices rank them differently.

Scoring rubric — social-angle analysis of the PK textbook corpus

The seven-axis instrument, fixed before any book was read, with the scoring rules and the evidence standards every claim on this site must meet.

Edition audit — is the corpus holding each board's *latest* books?

Proof that the books analysed here are the current ones — and the finding that curriculum vintage, not province, is the sharper divide.

What the Pupil Must Write

A journal-length article arguing that what pupils are required to write in examinations is a stronger instrument for reading a curriculum than what its textbooks say.

What the Treatment Predicts

Twenty-six falsifiable predictions about what these four curricula should produce in the pupils formed by them — attitudes, and then personality structure — each with the test that would refute it.

Thread: Iconoclasm — is there an equivalence chain from Makkan idols to Hindu India?

Does any board link the smashing of idols at Makkah to Muslim conquest in India? A four-tier evidence test, and what each province actually does.

Thread: Moral rescue — is pre-Islamic Arabia set against Hindu/pre-Islamic India as a shared state of barbarism?

Testing whether pre-Islamic Arabia and pre-Islamic India are constructed as a shared barbarism from which Muslim rule delivered rescue.

Thread: The mother tongue — is a province's own language taught as literature, or named as heritage?

Every board names its regional poets. Only Sindh teaches one as a set text — and no Punjabi poet appears in any of Punjab's five Urdu literary readers.

Social lenses

Subject tracks