Overview / Studies / Social Studies / History / Geography (Classes 6–8): Comparative Analysis of Punjab (PCTB), Sindh (STBB), and KP (KPTBB) Textbooks

Social Studies / History / Geography (Classes 6–8): Comparative Analysis of Punjab (PCTB), Sindh (STBB), and KP (KPTBB) Textbooks

The boards do not even agree what this subject is: one integrated volume in some provinces, split History and Geography in others.

Last substantive revision . Findings are revised as evidence changes; cite the date you read.


Sources analyzed (paths relative to extracted-text/):

#FileBoard / Class / SubjectMediumExtraction
1social-studies-6-enSTBB Sindh 6, Social Studies (integrated)EnglishOCR, 232 pp.
2social-studies-7-enSTBB Sindh 7, Social Studies (integrated)EnglishOCR, 196 pp.
3social-studies-8-enSTBB Sindh 8, Social Studies (integrated)EnglishOCR, 66 pp.
4history-6-enPCTB Punjab 6, HistoryEnglishOCR, 104 pp.
5geography-6-enPCTB Punjab 6, GeographyEnglishOCR, 89 pp.
6history-7-enPCTB Punjab 7, HistoryEnglishOCR, 108 pp.
7geography-7-enPCTB Punjab 7, GeographyEnglishOCR, 93 pp.
8history-8-enPCTB Punjab 8, HistoryEnglishNative digital, 94 printed pp.
9geography-8-enPCTB Punjab 8, GeographyEnglishOCR, 89 pp.
10history-6-urKPTBB KP 6, HistoryUrdutesseract-urd, 104 pp. — theme-grade
11geography-6-urKPTBB KP 6, GeographyUrdutesseract-urd, 135 pp. — theme-grade
12history-7-urKPTBB KP 7, HistoryUrdutesseract-urd, 101 pp. — theme-grade
13geography-7-urKPTBB KP 7, GeographyUrdutesseract-urd, 161 pp. — theme-grade
14history-8-urKPTBB KP 8, HistoryUrdutesseract-urd, 59 pp. — theme-grade
15geography-8-urKPTBB KP 8, GeographyUrdutesseract-urd, 49 pp. — theme-grade

Citation convention: “p.N” is the ===== PAGE N ===== marker in the extracted file, i.e. the Nth page of the source PDF, which typically runs a few pages ahead of the printed folio. PCTB History 8 is native text with no page markers; it is cited by printed folio from its table of contents. All verbatim quotations in this report are from English-medium Punjab and Sindh books only, and every one has been re-grepped against its source file. KP material is Urdu OCR and is reported as theme and structure only — never quoted.


1. Per-book profiles

1.1 STBB Sindh, Class 6 — Social Studies (integrated, English)

1.2 STBB Sindh, Class 7 — Social Studies (integrated, English)

1.3 STBB Sindh, Class 8 — Social Studies (integrated, English)

1.4 PCTB Punjab, Class 6 — History

1.5 PCTB Punjab, Class 6 — Geography

1.6 PCTB Punjab, Class 7 — History

1.7 PCTB Punjab, Class 7 — Geography

1.8 PCTB Punjab, Class 8 — History (native digital text — highest fidelity)

1.9 PCTB Punjab, Class 8 — Geography

1.10 KPTBB KP, Class 6 — History (Urdu; theme-grade)

1.11 KPTBB KP, Class 6 — Geography (Urdu; theme-grade)

1.12 KPTBB KP, Class 7 — History (Urdu; theme-grade)

1.13 KPTBB KP, Class 7 — Geography (Urdu; theme-grade)

1.14 KPTBB KP, Class 8 — History (Urdu; theme-grade)

CORRECTION (added on cross-check by the history lens, lens history §13). The arc described above understates the book’s reach: it does not stop at 1971. A numeral probe of the same file returns 1971, 1973, 1977, 1988, 1999, 2008, 2018 and 2022, with Bhutto, Zia, Nawaz Sharif and Imran Khan all present. KP History 8 is the most current history text in the corpus — it runs to the 2022 no-confidence vote, further than any Punjab or Sindh volume. The “59 pp.” figure is also misleading: the scan is a two-up spread, so the real book is roughly 115 printed pages. Both points matter for vintage control, because they make KP’s class-8 slot a modern book, not a short legacy one.

1.15 KPTBB KP, Class 8 — Geography (Urdu; theme-grade)


2. Class-by-class comparison

Class 6

Sindh (integrated SS)Punjab (History + Geography)KP (History + Geography)
History taughtOrigins of humanity; Indus Valley (4 chapters)World ancient civilizations → Greece/Rome → Aryans/Kushans/Guptas → rise of Islam (stops ~661 CE)Indus Valley → Aryans/religions/Gandhara → Muslim arrival 711 → Delhi Sultanate → Sufism (2500 BC–1526 AD)
Non-Muslim religionsnot a topicHinduism never named as a religion; Buddhism warmHinduism, Buddhism, Jainism each described sympathetically + comparison table
GeographySouth Asia; land, people, workPhysical earth science + disasters; no populationSolar system, maps, spheres, landforms, Pakistan physical, population, settlements
CivicsGovernment, local government, elections, media in a democracy (2 full units)nonenone
Climate changeabsentpresent and current (2022 floods)environment via human–environment unit
Provincial foregroundingMoen-jo-Daro anchors the history unit; preface promises “especially Sindh”noneGandhara, Shahbazgarhi, Hund, Peshawar threaded throughout

At class 6 the three provinces teach three different subjects. A Sindhi child spends the year on the Indus Valley plus how government and the media work; a Punjabi child does a world-civilizations survey ending in the seventh century, with no civics at all; a KP child does a full sweep from the Indus Valley to 1526 including comparative religion.

Class 7

SindhPunjabKP
History taughtAncient India, Persia, transition to modernityMedieval Europe (40 pp) + Umayyads/Abbasids + Crusades + Delhi Sultanate + Mughals + RenaissanceMughals only, 1526–1857
World historymodestthe corpus maximumzero
CivicsConstitution 1973, fundamental rights, UDHR, CRC, civil society, advocacynonenone
Economicsdemand and supply, curves and schedulesagriculture/minerals as resourcesagriculture, minerals, industry, trade, transport (5 chapters)
GeographyLand and life in Asia; water; migrationPlains/rivers, water, settlements, agriculture, Climate Change chapter, mineralsSystematic physical geography (6 ch.) + Pakistan economic geography (5 ch.)
Provincial foregrounding2010 flood/Tori Bund, 2001 drought as case materialnoneSher Shah Suri, Ahmad Shah Abdali, Khushal Khan Khattak, Balakot, Nowshera; Gadoon-Amazai, Karak, Orakzai, Swat emeralds

Class 7 is where the boards diverge most violently. Punjab’s history hour is spent substantially in Europe; KP’s is spent entirely on the Mughals; Sindh’s is spent on ancient India and then on the constitution and microeconomics.

Class 8

SindhPunjabKP
Colonial/Pakistan narrativeone chapter, ~8 pp (Ch.8, pp.52–59)the whole 94-pp History bookthe whole 59-pp History book
End point19471971 → Afghan War → army operations to 20171971 and after (incl. sanctions)
World historyUN chapterfull World Wars I & II chapternot recovered
Geographyworld climate regions, resources, population, communications (old federal text)Oceans, Living with Climate, Pollution, Industry/Trade, Transport, Development; no populationenvironment, pollution block, resources, climate/extreme weather, trade
Climate changeabsentcorpus maximum (47 mentions)present, incl. 2022
Civicsabsent (present in its own class 7)minimalnot recovered

3. Similarities and common themes

  1. 1857 is “the War of Independence” in every board that teaches it — Punjab, Sindh and KP all reject the term “Mutiny” explicitly or implicitly, and all three treat it as the origin point of the freedom struggle.
  2. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan is the shared hinge figure. Punjab calls him the “Father of the Pakistan Movement” and credits him with the Two-Nation Theory; Sindh credits him with first presenting the ideology of Pakistan; KP gives him a dedicated block on his educational, social and political services. He is the single most consistently venerated modern figure across all three provinces.
  3. The Pakistan Movement is a class-8 subject everywhere. No board teaches it at class 6 or 7; all three defer it to the final middle-school year, and in Punjab and KP it consumes an entire volume.
  4. Partition violence is absent from every book in the corpus. Migration appears; massacres, trains, abductions and the death toll do not, in any direction, in any province.
  5. Provincial history is absent from its own province’s books. PCTB has no Sikh-era or colonial Punjab and no Ranjit Singh; STBB has no 1843 annexation, no Talpurs, no Hoshu Sheedi, and does not even teach Muhammad bin Qasim; KP’s own past enters only as scattered insertions rather than as an organizing frame.
  6. Aurangzeb is treated sympathetically wherever he appears (Punjab H7 p.84; KP H7), with jizya either omitted or explained as a shariah levy, and Dara Shikoh absent.
  7. Din-i-Ilahi is framed as a deviation corrected by Mujaddid Alf Sani in both Punjab (p.76) and KP — an identical corrective move in two separately authored books.
  8. Kashmir carries a standard cartographic treatment across boards: plebiscite disclaimers on Punjab’s maps and “INDIAN ILLEGALLY OCCUPIED JAMMU & KASHMIR” labels in Punjab Geography 8, with Kashmir and the UN resolutions handled in both Sindh’s and KP’s class-8 books.

4. Divergences

4.1 The same conqueror, three motives (Mahmud of Ghazni and Ghori)

Punjab’s History 7 gives Mahmud of Ghazni’s seventeen invasions purely political motives and omits Somnath and the temple raids entirely (p.60) — yet the very next page gives Ghori an explicitly religious motive:

“Being a Muslim, he might like to conquer the Hindus of India and spread Islam” — PCTB History 7, p.61

KP’s History 6, by contrast, itemizes Somnath (1025) and retains the idol-breaker epithet while simultaneously crediting Mahmud’s patronage of Firdausi and Al-Biruni (pp.53–55). Sindh teaches neither figure at all. The most “communal” rendering of Mahmud in the corpus is therefore in the Urdu-medium KP book, and the most sanitized in the SNC Punjab book — the opposite of what the boards’ reputations would predict.

4.2 Conquest framing versus Crusade framing (Punjab)

Punjab History 7 describes conversion in South Asia as voluntary and attraction-driven:

“Arabs did not force the locals to embrace Islam. They were rather impressed by the equality, caste-less system and social justice of Muslims.” — PCTB History 7, p.32

but describes the Crusaders’ religious motivation as pathology mixed with “greed, loot, and plunder” (p.54). Religious motive is a vice in one direction and an absence in the other; the asymmetry is internal to a single chapter sequence.

4.3 Colonial racial ethnography survives in Punjab’s Geography 6

The climatic-regions unit reproduces nineteenth-century racial description as present-tense fact:

“Wild people with small height lives in Congo. People are uncivilized. People have no interest in religion, education” — PCTB Geography 6, p.39

with Amazon peoples “known as Red Indians” (p.40) and Arctic peoples “known as Eskimos” (p.42) — the latter two even recurring as multiple-choice options (p.47). No comparable passage was found in the Sindh or KP volumes.

4.4 Hindu–Muslim relations: adversarial versus pluralist, and it flips within Sindh

Sindh’s class-8 volume is the most adversarial text in the corpus:

“Sir Syed Ahmed Khan presented the ideology of Pakistan for the first time due to the biased attitude of the Hindus.” — STBB Social Studies 8, p.52

“The Hindu racists were not only against Muslims but were against all other minorities and even Christians became victims of their atrocities.” — STBB Social Studies 8, p.52

“the Hindus had no clean heart for the Muslims” — STBB Social Studies 8, p.54

Punjab’s History 8 is adversarial in the same register, if less lurid — Hindu–Muslim unity failed “due to the negative attitude of Hindus” (p.52), and the 1965 army is described as “filled with the spirit of Jihad” (p.87).

Yet Sindh’s own class-7 book, one grade earlier, is pluralist — Ashoka admired, the Gupta era a golden period, Diwali, Holi and Baisakhi listed warmly (p.79), Ottoman millets and Cyrus’s tolerance praised. And KP’s History 6 gives Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism sympathetic parallel treatment with a comparison table (pp.34–35). The sharpest divide in the corpus is not between provinces but between curricular generations inside one province.

4.5 1857: whose war was it?

“the War of Independence, (1857) was the result of strong Muslim feeling of gaining back their lost power.” — STBB Social Studies 8, p.53

“The War of Independence was fought in 1857 CE in which all communities of India participated.” — PCTB History 8, ch.1 summary (printed p.15)

Sindh makes 1857 a Muslim war for lost sovereignty; Punjab makes it an all-communities war. Sindh nonetheless supplies the sharper anti-colonial line — “The British called this war a Mutiny … But this war was the first united effort of the Indians” (p.53) — while Punjab’s book offers no economic critique of colonialism at all.

4.6 Civics exists in Sindh and nowhere else

“Pakistan has a democratic system of government. In a democracy, citizens make decisions regarding who will be their leaders and what laws will be made by their elected representatives.” — STBB Social Studies 6, p.59

Sindh’s class-6 volume also asks students to “Identify the problem of woman citizens have in participating in the political process and suggest ways to address them” (p.59), to examine “the role of media in the election process” (p.59), and to run mock school elections. Its class-7 volume frames civil society as existing to “limit and control the power of the” state (p.60). There is no equivalent anywhere in the Punjab or KP class 6–8 books — the SNC split allocates the subject hours to History and Geography and leaves citizenship unplaced.

4.7 Climate change tracks edition age, not province

“Earth’s climate is destabilizing because of the rising atmospheric absorptions of carbon dioxide” — STBB Social Studies 7, p.80

Climate change is present and current in every post-2015 book — Punjab’s whole SNC set (Geography 8 alone mentions it 47 times), Sindh’s class 7, and KP’s Geography 8 with 2022 extreme-weather material. It is absent only from Sindh’s class-8 federal reprint, which also lacks civics. The determinant is the age of the edition, not the politics of the board.


5. Notable findings

  1. The most consequential fault line is vintage, not province. Sindh runs a modern competency-based 2014/15-curriculum book at classes 6 and 7 beside an early-2000s federal ideology text at class 8. A Sindhi child moves from a pluralist, constitution-and-rights curriculum to an adversarial one in a single year, and simultaneously loses civics and climate change. Any provincial characterization of “Sindh’s textbooks” is false at the grade level.
  2. Punjab’s SNC split materially changes what a child learns, and the losses are specific. Splitting Social Studies into History and Geography produced strong, current, technocratic geography (GIS, climate, real trade statistics) and a coherent chronological history spine — but it eliminated citizenship education entirely, and both Punjab geography volumes examined lack any population or demography chapter, a topic both Sindh and KP teach.
  3. Ideological load in Punjab sits almost entirely in History. Geography is technocratic, its ideology confined to Kashmir map labels and celebratory CPEC framing. The split therefore concentrates rather than distributes the contested material — one book carries it, and one book could be revised to change it.
  4. KP’s Urdu books are less communal on pre-modern religion than Punjab’s English ones. KP History 6 gives Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism sympathetic comparative treatment; Punjab History 6 never names Hinduism as a religion at all. This inverts the common assumption about medium and board.
  5. No board foregrounds its own province. Punjab’s books carry “ONE NATION, ONE CURRICULUM” and contain no Sikh-era or colonial Punjab. Sindh promises “especially Sindh” in a preface and delivers South Asia-scale geography with 26 Sindh mentions in 232 pages, and teaches neither Muhammad bin Qasim nor the 1843 annexation. KP is the partial exception — but even there provincial identity is insertion, not organization: Gandhara sites, Sher Shah Suri, Ahmad Shah Abdali, Khushal Khan Khattak and Gadoon-Amazai are threaded into otherwise national templates, and Peshawar is never profiled as a city even in the chapter that profiles Karachi, Tokyo and London.
  6. Punjab is the only board teaching substantial world history at this level — 40 pp of medieval Europe at class 7 and a full World Wars chapter at class 8. KP’s class 7 has none whatsoever. A Punjabi and a KP eighth-grader finish middle school with incompatible mental maps of the twentieth century.
  7. Cumulative sequencing works in KP and fails across boards. KP’s geography deliberately splits map skills and population (class 6) from systematic physical and economic geography (class 7). But the three provinces’ sequences are mutually incompatible: a child transferring provinces between classes 6 and 8 would miss either the entire colonial narrative, or all civics, or all world history.
  8. Two silences are shared by all three boards: Partition violence, and any economic critique of colonialism. Neither the drain of wealth, famines, nor deindustrialization appears — and nor does the railways-and-modernization counter-narrative.
  9. Both KP class-8 files are complete, not truncated, despite being only 59 and 49 pages; each terminates on a KPTBB colophon with a print code. KP’s class-8 books are genuinely about half the length of Punjab’s equivalents, which is itself a finding about instructional time.

6. Caveats


Balochistan (BTBB) — the split model, and the corpus’s most self-critical history book

Added 23 Aug 2026. All National Curriculum 2022-23 pilot editions.

Balochistan follows the History + Geography split, like Punjab and KP, and unlike Sindh’s single integrated Social Studies volume. It is the only board that publishes both media at every class in this family, which makes it the one place in the corpus where an English-medium and an Urdu-medium pupil can be compared on identical course content.

ClassHistory (Urdu)History (English)Geography (Urdu)Geography (English)
6133 pp · A1 3104 pp · A1 1100 pp · A1 1
7166 pp · A1 393 pp · A1 1100 pp · A1 1
8176 pp · A1 4148 pp · A1 4104 pp · A1 192 pp · A1 1

Geography is effectively secular at every class in both media — 0.1 to 0.2 religious tokens per thousand words. History is where the religious framing lives, and it rises from class 6 to 8. The subject split is doing real work: a Balochistan pupil’s geography is not a vehicle for anything.

History 8 — the most internally critical book in the current corpus

The English-medium History 8 is quotable, and it is the most surprising book this project has read.

It records joint action rather than communal separation: “Muslims and Hindus had jointly participated in the War of Independence of 1857” (PAGE 6). It rejects collective blame: “both Hindus and Muslims had participated in the war and blaming Muslims alone was unjust” (PAGE 8). It records pluralist institution-building — Aligarh “was not just for Muslim students but was open to students of other religions, including Hindus, Parsis, and Christians” (PAGE 9).

And it assigns fault inward twice, which almost nothing else in this corpus does:

“To some extent, Muslims themselves were responsible for this decline, as they could not adjust to changing times” (PAGE 6)

“Simple-minded Muslims were deeply influenced by this fatwa and sold their properties at low prices” — on the Hijrat movement (PAGE 54)

That is A4 = 2, the lowest narrative-closure score assigned to any book in the study.

Where hostility appears it is attributed to named actors, not to a bloc: “some Hindu leaders in Banaras”, “this hostile attitude of the Hindu leaders towards Urdu” (PAGE 11). A6 = 3 — historical adversary, not essentialised difference — despite the book carrying the highest out-group token density in the Balochistan set at 15.7 per thousand words. Volume is not hostility, and this book is the clearest demonstration of that in the corpus.

The counterweight, in the same board, one year later. Pakistan Studies 9 closes the narrative again: the Hindu–Muslim divide “involve[s] the confrontation of two distinct social structures” (PAGE 8), and A6 rises to 4. A Balochistan pupil moving from class 8 to class 9 meets a narrowing, not a widening — the reverse of the progression this track finds in Punjab and KP.

What the assessment does to all of it

History 8 sets 32 evaluation prompts and zero open-opinion prompts, and runs the justify-that template on contested propositions — including “Justify that the Treaty of Sevres is based on fair justice” (PAGE 32), which the book’s own narrative contradicts. The pupil meets an unusually honest account of the past and is never once asked what they make of it.

Cite this study

Textbook Evidence Project, “Social Studies / History / Geography (Classes 6–8): Comparative Analysis of Punjab (PCTB), Sindh (STBB), and KP (KPTBB) Textbooks”, revised 2026-08-23. Retrieved from /studies/track-social-studies/

Found an error?

Corrections are published, not quietly patched. Name the section and the claim, and give the board, book, edition and printed page if you have them. See the corrections log for every correction made so far.

← All studies