Overview / Database / Pakistan Studies 10
Pakistan Studies 10 EM KPK
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Textbook Board, Peshawar
Bibliographic record
| Board | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Textbook Board, Peshawar |
|---|---|
| Class | 10 |
| Subject | Pakistan Studies |
| Medium | English |
| Curriculum | National Curriculum 2006 |
| Edition | 2022-23 |
| Approval | NOC F.8-5/2011 SSG dated 4 April 2011 |
| Pages | 131 |
| File size | 60.4 MB |
| PDF producer | Canva |
Analysis
Published for KPTBB by Leading Books Publisher in Peshawar under a 2011 NOC and printed for 2022-23, its four chapters end their political narrative at the 2008 transition, with no CPEC and no 2013 or 2018 elections. It is the strongest civics text of the three boards' non-Sindh Pakistan Studies volumes and contains the corpus's most sustained criticism of Pakistan's own rulers: Zia's total ban on freedom of expression and political activities, the over-extension of his military rule denying institutions the chance to grow, 1999 named as the overthrow of an elected civilian government, Kargil treated as a loss of face, and the 2007 lawyers' movement narrated approvingly. It carries the corpus's only operational citizen-redress instruction, how to complain to the Wafaqi Mohtasib on plain paper by ordinary post, yet has zero hits for human rights or the UDHR. Its Afghan refugees section is the corpus's only sustained treatment of a resident foreign population and is net-negative. Note that books.json holds no scores or evidence for this id; its scoring lives in the lens documents, and its second chapter title was lost to OCR entirely.
Evidence tier
scanned English OCR — quotation permitted after re-verification by exact string match.
Measured scores
Axes not listed were not scored for this book — coverage is uneven by design. All axes run 1–5, where 1 is the secular/pluralist/open pole. See the method.
Evidence recorded 6
Three kinds, deliberately styled apart. A quotation is verbatim wording and is only ever taken from English-medium text. An observation describes structure or theme — the only kind permitted for Urdu and Sindhi material, which this project never quotes. An absence is a negative result: a probe was run and returned nothing, which is the weakest claim made anywhere on this site.
observation religion lens A1 = 4 English OCR #e01
quotation civics lens A2 = 3 PDF p. 13 English OCR #e02
absence history lens A3 = 3 PDF p. 7 English OCR #e03
A negative result. It records that a probe was run and found nothing — not that the thing is not in the book. Where this rests on Urdu material the correct reading is not established, never absent, because degraded Nastaliq OCR cannot tell those apart.
quotation patriotism lens A5 = 3 PDF p. 7 English OCR #e04
observation othering lens A6 = 3 English OCR #e05
Every passage recorded for this book is shown above — nothing is withheld or truncated. Each item has a permanent anchor, so a single piece of evidence can be linked and disputed on its own.
Findings that cite this book 3
Assessmenthigh confidence
KP's Pakistan Studies 10 narrates the 1970 election, the East Pakistan deadlock, the imposition of martial law, nationalisation, Islamisation and the Afghan Jihad — and contains zero evaluation verbs and zero open-opinion prompts in the entire volume. Its learning outcomes are Explain, Discuss, Identify, Comprehend and Analyse; its assessment is recall of dates. Content analysis would score this book as relatively open. Assessment analysis scores it closed.
Counter-evidence, at equal prominence: The same volume calls the 1973 document “a new constitution based on federal and parliamentary principles… For the first time in the country's history a bicameral” legislature (p. 13), and states plainly that in 1970 “the Awami League carried the day” in East Pakistan while the PPP won in the West (p. 8). The information is genuinely there; only the demand to judge it is missing.
Assessmenthigh confidence
This study previously reported that open inquiry collapses at matriculation. Completing the class-10 tier shows that is wrong as stated: Punjab's English 10 sets 22 open-opinion prompts, the most of any book in the corpus, and Sindh's sets 5. Every one of them is on a personal, scientific or literary topic — climate change, social media, space travel, a lottery win. The class-10 books that carry the national narrative set none at all. Openness is not absent at matriculation; it is allocated away from contested national questions.
Counter-evidence, at equal prominence: Sindh's English 10 asks “Do you think that social media is a good thing or a bad thing” (p. 78) and KP's asks “in your opinion, is the significance of the Masjid of Cordoba” (p. 55) — all three boards teach the form of holding an opinion. The restriction is in subject matter, not in pedagogy.
Methodhigh confidence
Balochistan and KP both publish class-10 Pakistan Studies under National Curriculum 2006. Balochistan's teaches the 1973 Constitution as a live rights instrument guaranteeing minority rights, teaches local government with reserved seats for women and minorities, and narrates Benazir Bhutto's two terms as Prime Minister in substantive political detail. KP's ends constitution-making earlier and names no woman in government.
A finding states and cites; it does not argue. The argument is in the studies. Where a finding has counter-evidence it is printed above, in the same block, because a finding that hides its counter-evidence is a worse finding rather than a stronger one.
Availability of the book itself
Download this book (PDF, 60.4 MB)
Published by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Textbook Board, Peshawar, which holds copyright in it. Served here unmodified, without charge and without advertising, to preserve public access to material its publisher distributes free — source links rot and editions are withdrawn, and several in this catalogue already have. This is an archival mirror, not a licence granted by the Board. The Board may have it removed at any time, for any reason, and the removal will be recorded publicly. Verify your copy against the SHA-256 below.
Provenance
| Local file | kptbb-kp/class-10/pakistan-studies-10-en.pdf |
|---|---|
| Copy retrieved | |
| SHA-256 of the analysed file | cca3583744e25904e9e4ddb956b62c792b2cb7b0b7d54b010473e1f8c22ec7db |
| Source | https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1LAW8JZynV6qGHrVyJc0QFQ8B8RdKR_oa |
The checksum is of the exact file these findings were computed from, so anyone can prove they hold the same bytes. The retrieval date is when this copy was fetched to the project's own disk, not a formal web-archive capture. Boards and mirrors reprint and reorganise continuously, so a source link may not resolve, and may not serve the same edition if it does. The bibliographic record above — board, class, subject, medium, curriculum, edition, approval reference and page count — is what identifies the book; the link is a convenience. This project does not republish the PDF itself, for the copyright reasons set out in about.
Identifiers and permanent link
| Record ID | kptbb-pakistan-studies-10-en |
|---|---|
| Permanent link | /books/kptbb-pakistan-studies-10-en/ |
| This record as data | /books/kptbb-pakistan-studies-10-en.json · whole dataset |
The record ID is an accession number that happens to be readable. It never changes, even if the metadata encoded in it turns out to be wrong — if this book's board, class, subject or medium is corrected, the correction appears in the fields above and the ID stays as it is. That is the only way a link made today still resolves in ten years. The full rule is in the standards.
Cite this record
kptbb-pakistan-studies-10-en, corpus version 210 records. Retrieved from /books/kptbb-pakistan-studies-10-en/If you are quoting a passage from the book rather than citing this record, cite the book — the bibliographic details above are what identifies it — and say that you found it here. Two citations, not one.
Challenge this record
If the edition is misidentified, a score does not survive its evidence, the source link is wrong, or a passage is unfairly characterised, that is worth reporting and will be acted on whether or not the correction suits the argument. Corrections are published in the corrections log, never quietly patched. This applies fully to the board that publishes this book: any reply will appear beside the finding it concerns, under the right of reply.