The highest out-group volume in the Balochistan set — 15.7 tokens per 1,000 words — but the register is historical-political, not essentialising. It records joint action: "Muslims and Hindus had jointly participated in the War of Independence of 1857" (history-8-en · PAGE 6); it rejects collective blame: "both Hindus and Muslims had participated in the war and blaming Muslims alone was unjust" (PAGE 8); and it records pluralist institution-building: Aligarh "was not just for Muslim students but was open to students of other religions, including Hindus, Parsis, and Christians" (PAGE 9). Where hostility is named it is attributed to specific actors — "some Hindu leaders in Banaras", "this hostile attitude of the Hindu leaders towards Urdu" (PAGE 11) — not to Hindus as such.
The most self-critical textbook in the corpus is Balochistan's History 8
Balochistan's History 8 assigns fault to Muslim actors for Muslim decline, rejects collective blame for 1857, records Hindu–Muslim joint action, and is openly critical of the Hijrat movement. It is the clearest instance of internal criticism found anywhere in the current corpus.
Balochistan's History 8 does something no other book in the current corpus does: it assigns fault inward. It records that “Muslims and Hindus had jointly participated in the War of Independence of 1857” (p. 6) and rejects collective blame outright — “both Hindus and Muslims had participated in the war and blaming Muslims alone was unjust” (p. 8). It calls the followers of the Hijrat movement “simple-minded” (p. 54). This is also the board's highest out-group volume at 15.7 tokens per thousand words, which is the point: the register is historical-political rather than essentialising, so volume alone would have misread it.
“To some extent, Muslims themselves were responsible for this decline, as they could not adjust to changing times”Balochistan History 8, NC 2022-23 pilot edition — PDF p. 6
What the books say
Each entry below is the catalogue's own record for that book on that
axis, printed as it stands. Pages marked PDF p. are counted from the first page of the scanned file, which is how most of this corpus was read; pages marked printed p. are the folio printed on the paper. The two differ by however many unnumbered cover leaves a volume carries, so the label matters when you go to check.
8.9/1k — the highest in the Balochistan set. Religion is the organising category of the narrative: the book's subject is the Muslims of the subcontinent as a community, and Muslim/Hindu is its primary analytic distinction throughout (history-8-en · PAGE 6, 11).
Against this
The same board's Pakistan Studies 9, one year later, closes the narrative again: the divisions between Hindus and Muslims “involve the confrontation of two distinct social structures” (p. 8). A Balochistan pupil moving from class 8 to class 9 meets a narrowing, not a widening.
Limits
The book also calls followers of the Hijrat movement “simple-minded” (p. 54) and states that blaming Muslims alone for 1857 “was unjust” (p. 8).
Boards and confidence
Balochistan high confidence
Confidence reflects the evidence tier this rests on. High means native or English-medium text verified by exact string match; medium means it depends partly on Urdu-medium material read at theme grade, or on an absence. See the method.
Source
Balochistan History 8, NC 2022-23 pilot edition — PDF p. 6
Balochistan Textbook Board, History 8 (NC 2022-23 pilot edition), PDF p. 6.
Cite this finding
Two citations are appropriate here, not one. The line above cites this finding. If you are quoting the textbook passage itself, cite the book — its full bibliographic record, edition and approval reference is on its own page, linked from each evidence entry above — and say that you found it here.
Challenge this finding
This is a claim about a printed book, so it is checkable, and it should be checked. If the citation is wrong, the edition is misidentified, the passage is quoted unfairly, or the finding does not survive its own evidence, that is worth reporting and it will be acted on whether or not the correction is convenient for the argument. Corrections are logged publicly in the corrections log; this applies fully to the boards themselves.