Trans-historical enmity, taught as examinable content. "In 1867, while exposing the enmity of Hindus against Muslims, Sir Syed Ahmad Khan had clearly declared:" — with the keyed option "(c) Hindus are not our friends." (p.18). "Quaid-e-Azam with his towering personality, overcame many problems created after independence. The Hindus tried to create all kinds of difficulties for Pakistan… and the ill-treatment of the Muslims by the Hindus" (p.37). "After the establishment of Pakistan, Hindu-Muslim riots had become common due to the hatred of Hindus towards the Muslims in India." (p.39). 1971 causes: "(ii) Impact of Hindus on Trade and Services… they were stirring up separation sentiments under hidden motives"; "(iv) Role of Hindu Teachers — Education sector in East Pakistan was totally under the control of the Hindus. They poisoned the Bengalis against Pakistan" (p.56). Arya Samaj "aimed at forcibly converting non-Hindus into Hindus" (p.4).
1971 is narrated three different ways, and only one board names the surrender
Punjab externalises the loss of East Pakistan almost entirely and never mentions the surrender. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa indicts its own military rule. Sindh is the only board in the corpus that prints the word "surrendered".
Punjab's Pakistan Studies 9 places the loss of East Pakistan outside Pakistan almost entirely, and the surrender never appears; the book's out-group register is set much earlier, with “Hindus are not our friends” printed as a keyed exam option at p. 18. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's volume of the same class takes the opposite route and indicts its own side, recording that a “never ending military dictatorship was becoming strong” — while, twenty pages on, running a section headed “NEGATIVE ROLE OF HINDU TEACHERS” (p. 95). Sindh is the only board in the corpus that prints the word “surrendered” at all. Three boards, one event, three incompatible accounts — and a pupil sees exactly one of them.
“a never ending military dictatorship was becoming strong in the country. Awami League, the wining party of 1970 elections was deprived of the power by one pretext or another… Many innocent citizens along with the Armed persons were killed in the military action.”Punjab Pakistan Studies 9, 2022-23 edition — PDF p. 18
What the books say
Each entry below is the catalogue's own record for that book on that
axis, printed as it stands. Pages marked PDF p. are counted from the first page of the scanned file, which is how most of this corpus was read; pages marked printed p. are the folio printed on the paper. The two differ by however many unnumbered cover leaves a volume carries, so the label matters when you go to check.
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan Studies 9
Bloc characterisation, one section-heading deep: "7. NEGATIVE ROLE OF HINDU TEACHERS — After establishment of Pakistan, unfortunately, Bangali Muslims had always been backward in education than Hindus. The Hindu teachers were in majority in schools and colleges. They prepared the minds of new generations to rebel against the ideology of Pakistan." (p.95). Also "the Hindu majority and the anti-Muslim [Congress]" (p.13); "the permanent domination of Hindu[s]" (p.24); "for Muslims to finish the Hindu Muslim enmity forever" (p.19) — though that same page adds "Interestingly, this idea was supported by some Hindu leaders including Lala Lajpat Rai."
The corpus maximum. "The Hindu racists were not only against Muslims but were against all other minorities and even Christians became victims of their atrocities." (p.52) — followed immediately by the trans-historical move: "the present behaviour of Indian Hindus is similar to that they has some on hundred and fifty years ago." [sic] (p.52). Also: "Sir Syed Ahmed Khan presented the ideology of Pakistan for the first time due to the biased attitude of the Hindus" and "Later, Hindu atrocities against the Muslims forced them to promote the ideology of Pakistan" (p.52); "But the Hindus had no clean heart for the Muslims. As a matter of fact the Hindus wanted to get power over the sub-continent after the British left." (p.54); "the policies of Congress convinced the Muslims that it basically wanted to establish the Hindu rule" (p.55).
Limits
KP's book uniquely records a named counterfactual: the last Governor of East Pakistan advised a political solution and was overruled.
Boards and confidence
PunjabSindhKhyber Pakhtunkhwa high confidence
Confidence reflects the evidence tier this rests on. High means native or English-medium text verified by exact string match; medium means it depends partly on Urdu-medium material read at theme grade, or on an absence. See the method.
Source
Punjab Pakistan Studies 9, 2022-23 edition — PDF p. 18; Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan Studies 9, printed 2024-25 edition — PDF p. 95; Sindh Social Studies 8, ~2020-21 reprint edition — PDF p. 52
The KP passage is at PDF p. 94 of Pakistan Studies 9 (NC 2006 scheme, academic year 2024–25).
Cite this finding
Two citations are appropriate here, not one. The line above cites this finding. If you are quoting the textbook passage itself, cite the book — its full bibliographic record, edition and approval reference is on its own page, linked from each evidence entry above — and say that you found it here.
Challenge this finding
This is a claim about a printed book, so it is checkable, and it should be checked. If the citation is wrong, the edition is misidentified, the passage is quoted unfairly, or the finding does not survive its own evidence, that is worth reporting and it will be acted on whether or not the correction is convenient for the argument. Corrections are logged publicly in the corrections log; this applies fully to the boards themselves.