0.3/1k across 56,516 words — near-secular for the subject that carries social content.
The strangest book in the corpus contains no Muslim-rule narrative at all
Sindh's 232-page Social Studies 6 has no early Islam, no Muhammad bin Qasim, no Mughals, no colonial era, no Pakistan Movement and no 1947. History is about 12% of it; civics and economics together are about 40%. The only person given a biographical paragraph is Charles Darwin. Jinnah appears twice, both times as a date exercise. British rule is mentioned once — as a unifier.
The list of what is missing is the finding. Sindh's 232-page Social Studies 6 has no early Islam, no Muhammad bin Qasim, no Mughals, no colonial era, no Pakistan Movement and no 1947. History is about 12% of the book; civics and economics together are about 40%. Jinnah appears twice, both times as a date exercise, and British rule is mentioned once — as a unifier. The only person given a biographical paragraph is Charles Darwin. At 0.3 religious tokens per thousand words across 56,516 words, it is close to secular for a subject that carries the social content.
What the books say
Each entry below is the catalogue's own record for that book on that axis, printed as it stands.
Boards and confidence
Sindh high confidence
Confidence reflects the evidence tier this rests on. High means native or English-medium text verified by exact string match; medium means it depends partly on Urdu-medium material read at theme grade, or on an absence. See the method.
Source
Sindh Social Studies 6, 2016 edition
Sindh Textbook Board, Social Studies 6 (Sindh Curriculum 2015), 232 pp.
Cite this finding
Textbook Evidence Project, “The strangest book in the corpus contains no Muslim-rule narrative at all”. Evidence from 1 textbook (Sindh). Corpus version 210 records. Retrieved from https://textbookevidence.com/findings/sindh-class6-outlier/
Two citations are appropriate here, not one. The line above cites this finding. If you are quoting the textbook passage itself, cite the book — its full bibliographic record, edition and approval reference is on its own page, linked from each evidence entry above — and say that you found it here.
Challenge this finding
This is a claim about a printed book, so it is checkable, and it should be checked. If the citation is wrong, the edition is misidentified, the passage is quoted unfairly, or the finding does not survive its own evidence, that is worth reporting and it will be acted on whether or not the correction is convenient for the argument. Corrections are logged publicly in the corrections log; this applies fully to the boards themselves.
Related findings
The same event, taught two opposite ways, in the same school year
Inquiry
A current textbook still teaches colonial racial theory as fact
Content
1971 is narrated three different ways, and only one board names the surrender
History
One explanation for 1971 survives in every board across twenty years of editions
Othering