0.3/1k across 56,516 words — near-secular for the subject that carries social content.
Overview / Findings / Religion
The only verbatim Quranic verses in any English-medium book sit in a social studies chapter
Sindh's Social Studies 6 presents creation and evolution as two coequal theories, quoting two Quranic verses with surah and verse citation as evidence, then presents natural selection straight on the following pages without resolving the contradiction. The stated learning outcome makes it curriculum-mandated.
The book sets creation and evolution side by side as two coequal theories, and supports the first by quoting two Quranic verses with surah and verse citation — scripture presented in the evidential slot. It then presents natural selection straight, over the following pages, without ever resolving the contradiction it has just created. The stated learning outcome makes this curriculum-mandated rather than an author's flourish. It sits inside a book that is otherwise near-secular, at 0.3 religious tokens per thousand words.
“There are many theories about the origin of human life. Among them, two are most important. One is the theory about creation and the other is the theory of evolution. Both theories explain the origin of human life.”Sindh Social Studies 6, 2016 edition
What the books say
Each entry below is the catalogue's own record for that book on that axis, printed as it stands.
Boards and confidence
Sindh high confidence
Confidence reflects the evidence tier this rests on. High means native or English-medium text verified by exact string match; medium means it depends partly on Urdu-medium material read at theme grade, or on an absence. See the method.
Source
Sindh Social Studies 6, 2016 edition
The creation-and-evolution material is at printed p. 6 of Social Studies 6.
Cite this finding
Two citations are appropriate here, not one. The line above cites this finding. If you are quoting the textbook passage itself, cite the book — its full bibliographic record, edition and approval reference is on its own page, linked from each evidence entry above — and say that you found it here.
Challenge this finding
This is a claim about a printed book, so it is checkable, and it should be checked. If the citation is wrong, the edition is misidentified, the passage is quoted unfairly, or the finding does not survive its own evidence, that is worth reporting and it will be acted on whether or not the correction is convenient for the argument. Corrections are logged publicly in the corrections log; this applies fully to the boards themselves.
Related findings
The same event, taught two opposite ways, in the same school year
Inquiry
1971 is narrated three different ways, and only one board names the surrender
History
One explanation for 1971 survives in every board across twenty years of editions
Othering
No woman appears as an agent of knowledge anywhere in the corpus
Gender