Trans-historical enmity, taught as examinable content. "In 1867, while exposing the enmity of Hindus against Muslims, Sir Syed Ahmad Khan had clearly declared:" — with the keyed option "(c) Hindus are not our friends." (p.18). "Quaid-e-Azam with his towering personality, overcame many problems created after independence. The Hindus tried to create all kinds of difficulties for Pakistan… and the ill-treatment of the Muslims by the Hindus" (p.37). "After the establishment of Pakistan, Hindu-Muslim riots had become common due to the hatred of Hindus towards the Muslims in India." (p.39). 1971 causes: "(ii) Impact of Hindus on Trade and Services… they were stirring up separation sentiments under hidden motives"; "(iv) Role of Hindu Teachers — Education sector in East Pakistan was totally under the control of the Hindus. They poisoned the Bengalis against Pakistan" (p.56). Arya Samaj "aimed at forcibly converting non-Hindus into Hindus" (p.4).
Overview / Findings / Othering
The man who campaigned against sati appears only as an enemy of Muslims
Raja Ram Mohan Roy — the reformer most associated with the abolition of sati — appears in Punjab's Pakistan Studies 9 solely as someone who "used to speak against Muslims out of Muslim hostility". The reform programme is not refuted; it is deleted.
Raja Ram Mohan Roy is the reformer most associated with the abolition of sati. In Punjab's Pakistan Studies 9 he appears once, as a man who “used to speak against Muslims out of Muslim hostility” — inside the same chapter that keys “Hindus are not our friends” as a correct answer (p. 18). His reform programme is never stated and therefore never refuted. This is the mechanism worth noticing: the book does not argue against the reform, it removes the reformer's reason for being in the story.
What the books say
Each entry below is the catalogue's own record for that book on that
axis, printed as it stands. Pages marked PDF p. are counted from the first page of the scanned file, which is how most of this corpus was read; pages marked printed p. are the folio printed on the paper. The two differ by however many unnumbered cover leaves a volume carries, so the label matters when you go to check.
Boards and confidence
Punjab high confidence
Confidence reflects the evidence tier this rests on. High means native or English-medium text verified by exact string match; medium means it depends partly on Urdu-medium material read at theme grade, or on an absence. See the method.
Source
Punjab Pakistan Studies 9, 2022-23 edition — PDF p. 18
The Ram Mohan Roy sentence is at PDF p. 4; the evidence record below is the same book’s headline record for this axis and covers a different passage.
Cite this finding
Two citations are appropriate here, not one. The line above cites this finding. If you are quoting the textbook passage itself, cite the book — its full bibliographic record, edition and approval reference is on its own page, linked from each evidence entry above — and say that you found it here.
Challenge this finding
This is a claim about a printed book, so it is checkable, and it should be checked. If the citation is wrong, the edition is misidentified, the passage is quoted unfairly, or the finding does not survive its own evidence, that is worth reporting and it will be acted on whether or not the correction is convenient for the argument. Corrections are logged publicly in the corrections log; this applies fully to the boards themselves.