Overview / Database / Pakistan Studies 10

Pakistan Studies 10 UM KPK

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Textbook Board, Peshawar

Bibliographic record

BoardKhyber Pakhtunkhwa Textbook Board, Peshawar
Class10
SubjectPakistan Studies
MediumUrdu
CurriculumNational Curriculum 2006
Edition2022-23
ApprovalNOC F.8-5/2011 SSG dated 4 April 2011
Pages127
File size24.2 MB
PDF producerA-PDF Watermark 4.7.6

Analysis

The Urdu-medium twin of KP's class-10 Pakistan Studies, carrying the same 2011 NOC and the same 2022-23 academic year, at 127 pages against the English edition's 131. It was catalogued but never analysed: no extracted text exists for it, no scores, no evidence entries, and no mention in any lens or track report. Nothing can be said about its content beyond what its English counterpart implies, and that inference is untested.

Evidence tier

scanned   Urdu/Sindhi OCR — theme-grade only. Structure and proper nouns, never wording. Nothing in this book is quoted anywhere in the study.

Measured scores

A1 Religious saturation 4
A2 Civic thickness 3
A3 Received truth 5
A4 Narrative closure 3
A5 Militarism 3
A6 Othering 3
A7 Gender conservatism 4

Axes not listed were not scored for this book — coverage is uneven by design. All axes run 1–5, where 1 is the secular/pluralist/open pole. See the method.

Evidence recorded 1

Three kinds, deliberately styled apart. A quotation is verbatim wording and is only ever taken from English-medium text. An observation describes structure or theme — the only kind permitted for Urdu and Sindhi material, which this project never quotes. An absence is a negative result: a probe was run and returned nothing, which is the weakest claim made anywhere on this site.

observation religion lens A1 = 4 Urdu OCR — theme-grade #e01

Urdu counterpart of the same course; theme-grade.

Every passage recorded for this book is shown above — nothing is withheld or truncated. Each item has a permanent anchor, so a single piece of evidence can be linked and disputed on its own.

Findings that cite this book 1

Assessmenthigh confidence

KP's Pakistan Studies 10 narrates the 1970 election, the East Pakistan deadlock, the imposition of martial law, nationalisation, Islamisation and the Afghan Jihad — and contains zero evaluation verbs and zero open-opinion prompts in the entire volume. Its learning outcomes are Explain, Discuss, Identify, Comprehend and Analyse; its assessment is recall of dates. Content analysis would score this book as relatively open. Assessment analysis scores it closed.

Counter-evidence, at equal prominence: The same volume calls the 1973 document “a new constitution based on federal and parliamentary principles… For the first time in the country's history a bicameral” legislature (p. 13), and states plainly that in 1970 “the Awami League carried the day” in East Pakistan while the PPP won in the West (p. 8). The information is genuinely there; only the demand to judge it is missing.

A finding states and cites; it does not argue. The argument is in the studies. Where a finding has counter-evidence it is printed above, in the same block, because a finding that hides its counter-evidence is a worse finding rather than a stronger one.

Availability of the book itself

Download this book (PDF, 24.2 MB)

Published by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Textbook Board, Peshawar, which holds copyright in it. Served here unmodified, without charge and without advertising, to preserve public access to material its publisher distributes free — source links rot and editions are withdrawn, and several in this catalogue already have. This is an archival mirror, not a licence granted by the Board. The Board may have it removed at any time, for any reason, and the removal will be recorded publicly. Verify your copy against the SHA-256 below.

Provenance

Local filekptbb-kp/class-10/pakistan-studies-10-ur.pdf
Copy retrieved
SHA-256 of the analysed filef4fde5b7c6c3302e98bd48714a5b3a6c4c46248934cd8e2c2c6b1a58003758af
Sourcehttps://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1qzrxG-asAZVcrquh_6T9lCfiYVW1ptRy

The checksum is of the exact file these findings were computed from, so anyone can prove they hold the same bytes. The retrieval date is when this copy was fetched to the project's own disk, not a formal web-archive capture. Boards and mirrors reprint and reorganise continuously, so a source link may not resolve, and may not serve the same edition if it does. The bibliographic record above — board, class, subject, medium, curriculum, edition, approval reference and page count — is what identifies the book; the link is a convenience. This project does not republish the PDF itself, for the copyright reasons set out in about.

Identifiers and permanent link

Record IDkptbb-pakistan-studies-10-ur
Permanent link/books/kptbb-pakistan-studies-10-ur/
This record as data/books/kptbb-pakistan-studies-10-ur.json · whole dataset

The record ID is an accession number that happens to be readable. It never changes, even if the metadata encoded in it turns out to be wrong — if this book's board, class, subject or medium is corrected, the correction appears in the fields above and the ID stays as it is. That is the only way a link made today still resolves in ten years. The full rule is in the standards.

Cite this record

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Textbook Board, Peshawar, Pakistan Studies 10 UM KPK, 2022-23. Catalogued by the Textbook Evidence Project as kptbb-pakistan-studies-10-ur, corpus version 210 records. Retrieved from /books/kptbb-pakistan-studies-10-ur/

If you are quoting a passage from the book rather than citing this record, cite the book — the bibliographic details above are what identifies it — and say that you found it here. Two citations, not one.

Challenge this record

If the edition is misidentified, a score does not survive its evidence, the source link is wrong, or a passage is unfairly characterised, that is worth reporting and will be acted on whether or not the correction suits the argument. Corrections are published in the corrections log, never quietly patched. This applies fully to the board that publishes this book: any reply will appear beside the finding it concerns, under the right of reply.

← Back to the database · what the axes mean →